Re: RFC Karma Request
| From: | Dmitry Derepko | Date: | Sun, 02 Feb 2025 09:28:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RFC Karma Request | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-126265@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Thank you, Ilija. I really appreciate it.
Could you please advise do I need to create RFC or it’s better do to it after solving technical
issues?
If so, one common RFC or each for each operator: return, break, continue?
I’d also like to see all this problems by myself and I have a question. Is it possible to run php
and add breakpoints somewhere at the parser and any other places? Is there an instruction how to
profile it? Thanks
----------
Best regards,
Dmitrii Derepko.
@xepozz
> On Feb 1, 2025, at 1:04 AM, Ilija Tovilo <tovilo.ilija@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitrii
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 3:10 PM Dmitry Derepko <xepozzd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I’m looking for way to gain some Karma to create an RFC.
>> I’ve already made first implementation and shared it:
>> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/17647
>>
>> I can make 3 different RFC to discuss each change separately, let me know if it’s
>> necessary.
>
> RFC karma was granted. Good luck!
>
> Note that I believe we should solve the technical issues mentioned on
> the PR before voting on this RFC. They are very much non-trivial to
> solve (I have tried multiple solutions over the years, all of which so
> far were complex or otherwise unsatisfactory). But I would be ready to
> investigate further, given that my long-standing RFC for match-blocks
> [1] is also affected, at least in an unrestricted form.
>
> Ilija
>
> [1] https://wiki.php.net/rfc/match_blocks