Re: Empty subject in match and switch constructions
| From: | Dmitry Derepko | Date: | Tue, 04 Feb 2025 07:43:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Empty subject in match and switch constructions | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-126278@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi, Larry!
> On Feb 3, 2025, at 10:01 AM, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2025, at 7:40 AM, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
>> Hi Dmitrii
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 1:05 PM Dmitry Derepko <xepozzd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short-match
>> https://externals.io/message/112496
>
> Hi, author of that RFC here. Although there seemed to be interest for it in the initial
> match() discussion, the stand-alone follow up was met with a giant "meh", which is why I
> didn't pursue it further. I would still be in favor of it, though, if it could get through
> internals. I'm happy to have someone pick it up and run with it, or collaborate on rebooting
> that RFC. (I'm pretty sure the patch for it actually worked, at least it did at the time.)
>
> --Larry Garfield
It looks funny that I’m following in your steps with the RFC’s didn’t go through 😃
By the way, I’ve implemented empty match subject in a bit different way: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/17692
About the RFC. What’s the way to re-activate it?
Will you re-activate it?
Do I need to create a new one referencing to this one?
Can you share rights to edit the RFC and we can push it further together?
----------
Best regards,
Dmitrii Derepko.
@xepozz