Re: Short class syntax and inner classes

On Fri, Feb 7, 2025, at 16:05, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Hi > > Am 2025-02-07 15:23, schrieb Rob Landers: > > Instantiation is done by static access: new Outer::Inner(1), which is > > currently a syntax error. > > How would I access static members on an inner class without having > ambiguity? Outer::Inner::Const already is valid syntax. I can actually answer this one. The name of an inner class must not conflict with either a const or a method in the outer class because this is also currently valid syntax new (Outer::Inner::Const) where it resolves to a string of an existing class or new (Outer::Inner::Method()) where it returns a string to an existing class. — Rob