Re: [RFC] Readonly property hooks
| From: | Tim Düsterhus | Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 2025 10:35:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Readonly property hooks | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-128158@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi
Am 2025-07-21 10:29, schrieb Nick:
I saw you voted “no” forI don't think I did ask *for* set(). I said I didn't see (obvious) problems with set(), in other words I said that I wasn't against it. See also https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/128123. Best regards Tim Düsterhusget(expected, and understandable), and decided to be abstinent toset. I double checked the full RFC discussion. You asked four times explicitly, and one time indirectly, to allowsetbut notget. Would you mind to elaborate why you decided to not vote “yes” for what you asked for?