Re: [RFC] Add "is_representable_as_float()" and "is_representable_as_int()" functions

On Tuesday 29 July 2025 18:04:06 (+02:00), Larry Garfield wrote:

On Tue, Jul 29, 2025, at 7:52 AM, Alexandre Daubois wrote:

Hi internals, I would like to present the RFC to add the "is_representable_as_float()" and "is_representable_as_int()" functions. These functions provide developers with a way to check whether values can be losslessly converted between integer and floating-point representations. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/is-representable-as-float-int Best, Alexandre Daubois

This looks lovely. Since only int, float, and string can ever be true, does it make sense to type the function parameters as int|float|string rather than mixed, to automatically exclude arrays, objects, and null? (All of which would always be false.)

There is prior art and also I'd personally recommend to abide to mixed to not open new gaps while closing older.

    php --rf is_countable
    Function [ <internal:standard> function is_countable ] {
          - Parameters [1] {
        Parameter #0 [ <required> mixed $value ]
      }
      - Return [ bool ]
    }

(I could probably argue either way on it, but my first inclination is yes; push the initial validation upstream. You should always know if a variable is a primitive or not, at the very least.)

IMHO this is not a validation but a test function. So if you think one should know, you probably should not need this function at all. Btw. is_primitive() was not a thing last time I looked. It would be great though to have the combined test of is_scalar() and is_null() in a single function call. This is perhaps something for the line-up. Just my 2 cents -- hakre