Re: [VOTE] "Abstain" voting option for RFCs
| From: | Andreas Heigl | Date: | Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:46:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE] "Abstain" voting option for RFCs | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-128515@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi all
Am 19.08.25 um 14:47 schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature OpenPGP_signature.asc
Hi Am 2025-08-19 14:06, schrieb Andreas Heigl:Thank you, Tim! In that case I stand corrected and - as already mentioned - changed my vote! Regards Andreas -- ,,, (o o) +---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+ | Andreas Heigl | | mailto:andreas@heigl.org N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" | | https://andreas.heigl.org | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | https://hei.gl/appointmentwithandreas | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | GPG-Key: https://hei.gl/keyandreasheiglorg | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+And as the RFC does not mention any possible future additions/ modifications regarding quorumThe RFC literally mentions “Quorum” as a “possible future modification” by listing “Introducing a quorum” in the “Future Scope” section. So I don't quite follow. I explicitly looked for that and seem to indeed have overlooked it!
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature OpenPGP_signature.asc