Re: [RFC] Partial Function Application v2

> On 9. Oct 2025, at 20:54, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote: > > One outstanding question is whether to allow reordering of parameters in the PFA closure by > using named arguments. With this implementation, Arnaud says it's possible to do if we decide > to. I am still concerned that it would create too much complexity and confusion in practice. But > we're willing to go with a broad consensus if it emerges. Hi I also find it confusing if I define a different parameter order in the partial function and then this order is automatically overridden to the original order rather than being used. When I consciously change the parameter order, I expect this order to be preserved in the resulting function. That's the behavior I would expect as a developer. Cheers Joshua Rüsweg