Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Prefix and Suffix Functions

From: Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 08:31:07 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Prefix and Suffix Functions
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-129878@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Am 2026-01-22 19:28, schrieb Barel:
Following a comment by Tim Düsterhus (thanks!) and another comment in the PR, I have inverted the order of the parameters in the ensure and remove functions, so that they follow the parameter order in related functions like str_contains() and str_starts_with()
Thank you. I have given the RFC another look and have some polishing comments: 1. In the “Exact semantics (per function)” example it would probably be easier to understand if you would provide a userland implementation. Folks are already used to reading PHP and there is no ambiguity about the proposed behavior then. As a benefit, the implementation from the RFC would directly be usable as a polyfill, e.g. for use in https://github.com/symfony/polyfill. The previous “array_find” RFC might be a good example here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_find 2. In the “Backwards Incompatible Changes” section: Can you please perform some research for a rough number estimation? e.g. using GitHub's code search. ------ Another thing I realized is the interaction between the _replace functions and PFA: It can be used as an (inefficient?) way of creating a concat as a function handle: $concat = str_prefix_replace("", ?, ?); (with suffix_replace being a reverse concat). Best regards Tim Düsterhus

« previous php.internals (#129878) next »