Re: [RFC] TLS Session Resumption Support for Streams

Hi Am 2026-03-04 23:11, schrieb Jakub Zelenka:

So I thought about this and it's really matter of taste that should not impact the primary vote. I think it makes sense to add a secondary votes for those namings to see what others prefer. I just did the RFC update and implementation. I introduced OpenSSLException for now but if the secondary vote results in namespace, I will change it before merging. In addition I also fixed the serialize and export / import to default to PEM which is better for PHP and more consistent with other functions.

Thank you. I'm okay with making this a secondary vote. You forgot to add the “Abstain” option to the secondary votes, I just did that for you. But you'll need to define the “tie breaker”. I assume you prefer to break the tie in favor of the non-namespaced names, since this is what the RFC uses? Either way, please note it down (it doesn't need an explanation, “Ties are broken in favor of X” is sufficient). Best regards Tim Düsterhus