Re: [RFC] php-community: a faster-moving, community-driven PHP.

From: Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 16:26:39 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] php-community: a faster-moving, community-driven PHP.
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-130354@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 3/15/26 09:51, Daniil Gentili wrote:
I don't understand the security part. Do you mean that people could report security issues for those community branches? If so, then it's completely unrealistic as we are already struggling with handling security issues for the current branches.
I honestly do not consider seriously any argument based on "it's too much load for maintainers", including around security (which is still a responsibility of feature owners).
A feature that ships in PHP is the responsibility of the core maintainers, regardless of who "owns" the feature. Ultimately, it all comes down to trust, and if PHP ships an insecure feature, the core maintainers can't shrug and point to the feature owners and say, "It's not our fault."
PHP is one of the most used programming languages in the world. The PHP foundation, and by proxy its sponsors, are actively paying php-src maintainers in order to not just make PHP secure, but also improve it in every way possible (unlike myself and Edmond, as we are both working as unpaid volunteers, investing a huge amount of time to develop and push major improvements to the language, for free). I honestly do not believe that sponsors actually paying the php-src maintainers would be against the introduction of genuinely useful, quality of life improvements like async, generics, etc just on the basis that it would be too much work for php-src maintainers.
One of the most used programming languages in the world is also one of the most underfunded programming languages in the world. You're overestimating donations to the PHP Foundation. This is why, in the recent search for a new executive director, we emphasized the importance of hiring someone who we think will be able to increase donations. I'm really excited about the future of the foundation, and when it has a stable pool of donors, maybe this conversation will be very different. The finances for the PHP Foundation are public: https://opencollective.com/phpfoundation#category-BUDGET If you look at expenses paid for the past year compared to contributions collected, you'll note the foundation has spent $100k more than it has collected. This is possible due to some large one-time donations by corporate sponsors, but it's not sustainable. We can change this. Convince companies who use PHP to commit to recurring donations. Once it has a sustainable revenue and is able to hire more than 10 full-time and part-time developers, maybe it will be able to fund projects like this. Cheers, Ben

« previous php.internals (#130354) next »