Re: strptime patch
| From: | Wez Furlong | Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:28:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: strptime patch | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-13043@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
*cough* windows *cough* probably doesn't have strptime (not that you'd care ;-))
It's also probably a good idea to add the check for the wierdo unix
flavours, just to be safe.
--Wez.
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:02:59 -0700, Sterling Hughes
<sterling.hughes@gmail.com> wrote:
> they are both in Single UNIX, its pretty reliable in my experience
> where one is, the other follows. i've only ran into difficulties wrt
> to what features are available on different OS', do you know a case
> where strptime isn't avail and strftime is?
>
> -sterling
>
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:07:55 +0200 (CEST), Derick Rethans
>
> <derick@php.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> >
> > > Sterling Hughes wrote:
> > >
> > > >i needed strptime() for a project i'm working on, its awful handy when
> > > >you are making dates with strftime(). any objections to committing
> > > >the attached patch?
> >
> > I think we need another #ifdef for this for the unlikely situation where
> > strptime is not available and strftime is.