Re: Re: [RFC] Polling API

From: Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 20:15:42 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Polling API
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-130540@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Am 2026-03-31 15:23, schrieb Jakub Zelenka:
There is actually no internal API for hooks so it would require using object handlers (which is from the user space point of view just __get). It means no stubs declaration either. We also don't have an internal policy where to use hooks and where methods. So there are still lots of blockers to start using it in core.
While I agree with the conclusion that using hooks internally is complicated and there is no real policy there, Valentin was actually making a good point: We could use regular readonly properties for those cases where we're just exposing a “constructor parameter”. Specifically: - Context::getBackend() -> public readonly Backend $backend; - Watcher::getHandle() -> public readonly Handle $handle; Potentially Watcher::$data could also be a regular (non-readonly) property, or does modifyData() contain additional logic that is not just “store the value somewhere”? There is precedent for this kind of regular readonly property referring to an input object in ext/random with Randomizer::$engine: https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/32c1931f18109655bc074dd5cda3248b838de636/ext/random/random.stub.php#L139 Best regards Tim Düsterhus

« previous php.internals (#130540) next »