Re: [RFC proposal] Syntactic sugar for array push()

From: Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 15:04:45 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC proposal] Syntactic sugar for array push()
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-130661@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Can someone create 2 votes?: - [-] for array_pop - [+] for array_push I don't have an account and rights; and let the discussion have a practical outcome (whether with a positive or negative result)? D. K. ne 14. 9. 2025 o 1:45 Morgan <weedpacket@varteg.nz> napísal(a): > On 2025-09-13 22:21, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote: > > On 12 September 2025 20:02:04 BST, "Dušan Kreheľ" > > <dusankrehel@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Since we have an extremely well-established array_push shorthand, so > don't need a new one, we could perhaps have "<" for "at start", and > "-" for > "pop": > > > > $foo[<] = $toUnshift; > > $shifted = $foo[-<]; > > > > Which looks like it would > > $foo[0] $foo[1] $foo[2] <-- put $toUnShift here > > rather than > > put $toUnshift here --> $foo[0] $foo[1] $foo[2] >

« previous php.internals (#130661) next »