Re: [RFC] Remove the links to X.com from PHP.net
| From: | Jim Winstead | Date: | Fri, 01 May 2026 18:54:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Remove the links to X.com from PHP.net | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-130738@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, May 1, 2026, at 5:40 AM, Paul Jones wrote:
>> On May 1, 2026, at 05:27, Alex Pierstoval Rock <pierstoval@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jim & all,
>>>
>>> Currently, the RFC states:
>>>
>>>> due to to the current nature of the site, there is no reason for the project to
>>>> have a presence there
>>> This is unclear -- what exactly about "the current nature of the site" leads
>>> to there being "no reason for the project to have a presence there" ? Can you articulate
>>> the specifics, for the record, in the PR?
>>>
>>>
>>> -- pmj
>>
>> Do you really need more details about why X/Twitter is a problem per se? This subject has
>> already been covered in several threads: its owner is a fascist that promotes and enhances fascism
>> with the help of his networks, he deliberately updated the recommendation algorithm to create a
>> personality-cult for his fame, the AI that's bound to this network is p*do-promoting, most of
>> the people that are still there are either fascism-enthusiasts or compliant with what the platform
>> has become (therefore, okay with the statu quo, which means "collaborating with the in-place
>> system").
>
> Great -- if those are the beliefs of the RFC author, they should go
> directly in the RFC as supporting language for the reasoning behind the
> RFC.
>
> Then there's a record of exactly who is voting in agreement with those
> statements, and who is not.
>
> If there is some worry or concern about adding the reasons, that itself
> will be quite telling.
I don't think I have been coy about the reasons at all, but I have updated the RFC. I'll
consider this a major change, so voting will happen after the 14-day cooling period. (So I will send
another message about the intent to call the vote in about a week.)
Cheers.
Jim