Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Bound-Erased Generic Types

From: Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 15:41:42 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Bound-Erased Generic Types
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-130892@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 15 May 2026, at 00:32, Seifeddine Gmati <azjezz@carthage.software> wrote: > PHP's type system has grown one feature per RFC for a decade: scalar types, union types, > intersection types, DNF, true/false/null types. None of those shipped the entire wishlist either. > class-string<T>, integer ranges, non-empty-string, negated > types, and literal types can each be their own future RFC. On this point; I still need to finish the RFC for a literal-string type, which already exists in Psalm and PHPStan. I've been using Joe Watkins' is_literal() implementation with 3 big production websites for some time, and Robert Landers has a prototype implementation as a proper type[1]. I just thought I'd give an example of a separate/small RFC. Craig [1] https://github.com/php/php-src/compare/master...bottledcode:php-src:add/literal-string-2

« previous php.internals (#130892) next »