Re: [RFC] Primary Constructors
| From: | Tim Düsterhus | Date: | Mon, 29 Jun 2026 19:04:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Primary Constructors | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-131607@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi
Am 2026-06-29 20:44, schrieb Eric Norris:
I'm afraid of going off-topic, but I disagree that "readonly is broken." In what way is it broken? A large part of the disagreement in the previous "readonly hooks" RFC was over the *meaning* of readonly. I'd have to fully go back to remind myself of the nuance, but my recollection is that it works exactly how I (and others, per the vote outcome) expect. […] This is not meant to be a combative email by the way, I just want to make sure it's clear that I believe readonly is not something that we should remove or consider baggage.I'm in full agreement on the quoted sections. Best regards Tim Düsterhus