Re: [RFC] Duration class
| From: | Tim Düsterhus | Date: | Sun, 19 Jul 2026 12:30:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Duration class | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-132026@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi
[clearing the cc list a bit]
On 7/19/26 07:02, Pierre Joye wrote:
To clarify and settle that discussion for the glory of the archive; We were like ships passing in the night for some of my disagreements. The RFC wiki page did not show the additional constructor for other units, which hence the inconsistency I pointed out for the extra ns argument in fromSecond. They are here, and reduce this down to a lower level of bad APIs, more a pragmatic compromise conciliating different (if not numerous) use cases. Anything can be perfect, or shipped. Choose one.Thank you! Glad we could clear that up.
I voted yes, ftr.Thanks! I'm not seeing you in the list for the primary vote, though. Note that each vote is a separate <form> element, so you need to submit each one individually for it to be counted. I assume you selected the option for each and then only pressed the submit button for the last, which then would only submit the last vote. Best regards Tim Düsterhus