Re: [RFC] [Discussion] PREG_THROW_ON_ERROR

From: Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 01:58:51 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Discussion] PREG_THROW_ON_ERROR
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-132245@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 3:56 AM Osama Aldemeery <aldemeery@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following the earlier pre-RFC discussion (https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/131783), > I've written this up as a proper RFC: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/preg_throw_on_error > > Short version: > > a PREG_THROW_ON_ERROR flag you pass to any > preg_*() call, so a PCRE error throws a > \PregException you can catch > instead of a warning plus a false / > null you have to notice and then chase through > preg_last_error(). > Same thing JSON_THROW_ON_ERROR and > FILTER_THROW_ON_FAILURE already do for their functions. > It's opt-in, so nothing changes without the flag. > > The flag only changes how an error is delivered. A call does exactly the same thing with it or > without it, byte for byte. > The only difference is that at the end, any error the call would have recorded is additionally > thrown, carrying the same code and > message > preg_last_error()/preg_last_error_msg() > would report. > > For array arguments that means the flag mirrors > preg_last_error()...it throws whatever error the same call leaves > there, > which for preg_replace() over an array is the last-processed > entry, not the first. (In the pre-RFC I'd floated throwing on the first failing element > instead). > Whether the preg_*() functions should stop at the first failing > entry is a separate question about those functions, one that applies with or without the flag, so > it's out of scope here. > > The exception name is settled from the pre-RFC as > \PregException (thanks Tim) and the flag as AäÛå: > Ƶ,�lÇFµPREG_THROW_ON_ERROR. > > Target is the next feature release after 8.6 since 8.6's beta1 is too close for this to > conclude discussion and a vote in time. > > I also saw Larry's note asking to hold new business that isn't targeting 8.6 until > the freeze rush is over. > This won't catch 8.6, so I'm not asking for any priority while the freeze is on. But > the pre-RFC discussion was already open before > Larry's note, so I'd rather keep it ticking over quietly than restart it in > September. > If someone prefers I park it until then, please say so and I will. > > Implementation and tests: > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/22797 > > Thanks, > Osama Hi all, This has gone quiet, which I'm taking as the freeze crunch and people being busy, not as everyone being fine with it as-is. And it isn't targeting 8.6 anyway, so there's no rush on my side. So I'll park it and bring it back early September just like Larry asked, once the release dust has settled, to give anyone who hasn't weighed in a clear window to do so. The points raised so far (the exception hierarchy, the warning behavior) are addressed in the RFC, so if it's still quiet after I resurface it, the natural next step is to move toward a vote. I'd rather that happen once everyone's had a fair chance than while half the list is heads-down on the release. If there's something you'd want settled before a vote, now or early September both work for me. I'll ping the thread again then. Thanks, Osama

« previous php.internals (#132245) next »