Re: [Concept] declare(strict_identifiers=1)

Hi Luca, On 26 August 2026 16:15:08 BST, "otzelot2021@outlook.de" <otzelot2021@outlook.de> wrote: >... well-formed UTF-8, UAX31-R1-2 with the standard >Default-Ignorable Exclusion Profile, and NFC required rather than >applied A couple of people have touched on this, but I don't think it's been directly addressed, so I'll ask it more explicitly: what do these terms mean? - UAX31-R1-2 - the standard Default-Ignorable Exclusion Profile - NFC I think that's important context for this discussion, but it's also relevant to the eventual user experience: what is the summary that goes into the manual and error messages? "Class name doesn't meet UAX31-R1-2" would be about as meaningful to most people as the infamous "Unexpected T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM". The other thing that I'm not entirely clear on is how much of this is or should be about *rejecting* names, and how much about *normalising* them - bearing in mind we already perform some normalisation in the form of ASCII case folding. Perhaps we need to step back and define the *problem statement* more clearly, rather than starting with a *solution* and trying to define its benefits? Regards, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]