Re: [VOTE] [RFC] IntlRelativeDateTimeFormatter

Hi On 2026-09-15 14:02, Weilin Du wrote:

I think you've read the RFC further after my latest response regarding your suggestions. And I think you have no further issues with it because you don't send more email to the thread. Maybe I don't have the English skill to make it clear about what is planned and made.

No, I hadn't taken another look at the RFC yet. I also made it clear that I had not given it much thought (due to time constraints). But my schedule should not be a blocker for RFCs to proceed.

> Content-wise I also don't agree with the decision to keep using untyped  > constants instead of enums, but didn't have the time to actually think  > this through or read the RFC in-depth. I have discussed this with David in the discussion thread. We all agree on this.

From what I see not much discussion has happened on that topic. It's basically just David suggesting it (and me previously suggesting it in private) and you declining the suggestion. I think we can find a reasonable middle-ground that makes use of enums, while not precluding a future redesign of the ext/intl API. I'll send those to the discussion thread to keep it in a single place. Best regards Tim Düsterhus