Re: [RFC] Opt-in JSON Comments and Trailing Commas
| From: | Larry Garfield | Date: | Tue, 13 Oct 2026 21:08:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Opt-in JSON Comments and Trailing Commas | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-132870@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Oct 13, 2026, at 1:36 PM, Otar Chekurishvili wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> I want to start the discussion of the RFC "Opt-in JSON Comments and
> Trailing Commas":
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/json_comments_trailing_commas
>
> The RFC adds two independent opt-in flags for json_decode() and json_validate():
>
> - JSON_ALLOW_COMMENTS accepts // line comments and /* block comments */.
> - JSON_ALLOW_TRAILING_COMMAS accepts one comma after the last item of a
> non-empty array or object.
>
> Strict JSON stays the default. json_encode() does not change.
>
> This RFC follows the pre-RFC thread:
> https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/132236
>
> Thank you for the feedback in that thread. The RFC now answers it:
>
> - The RFC does not add JSON5. It compares the two flags with JSON5,
> JSONC and JWCC (Larry, Anton).
> - The RFC keeps two flags, not one JSON_ALLOW_JSONC flag. The JSONC
> specification is a draft, and it makes trailing commas optional. The
> section "Rejected Features" gives all reasons (Tim).
> - The RFC includes test results and performance measurements.
>
> The implementation is here:
> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/23336
>
> The RFC has two primary votes, one for each flag. Each vote needs a 2/3
> majority.
>
> All feedback is welcome.
>
> Otar
I am forced to agree with Tim. This is a very tight RFC, and I have no remaining objections to it.
Nicely done!
--Larry Garfield