Re: php_fork();
| From: | ilya77@gmail.com | Date: | Mon, 15 Nov 2004 00:28:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: php_fork(); | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-13854@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Heh, ActiveState did it after they received funding from Microsoft.
Guess that's not gonna happen with PHP. Ever.
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:25:09 -0500, Wez Furlong <kingwez@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:05:16 +0200, ilya77@gmail.com <ilya77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > My point exactly.
> > However, I *know* that perl emulates it using threads.
>
> Which we don't support.
>
> > But, when thinking of it, Cygwin emulates fork() by copying the
> > address space of a process to a newly created process. It's a bit
> > slow, but at least it works.
>
> and is buggy.
>
> > Guess getting into the kernel mode driver land to create *actual*
> > fork() on win32 is a bit beyond php development.
>
> Services for Unix does this kind of thing; it's buggy too.
>
> It would be cool to have better threading support and perhaps emulated
> fork (it's not something I would use), but I can't see it happening
> without some funding behind it.
>
> --Wez.
>