Re: ReflectionClass::getMethod()

From: Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:31:58 +0000
Subject: Re: ReflectionClass::getMethod()
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-14210@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
ilya77@gmail.com wrote: > Why not just returning null when a method does not exist? > Actually CALLING a non-existing method should be treated as an error... Because try { $class = new ReflectionClass($this); $method = $class->getMethod($this->name); } catch (ReflectionException $e) { $this->fail($e->getMessage()); } is clearer than try { $class = new ReflectionClass($this); } catch (ReflectionException $e) { $this->fail($e->getMessage()); } $method = $class->getMethod($this->name); if ($method !== NULL) { // ... } else { // ... } I fail to see why exceptions wee introduced when they are not to be consistently used in functionality that was added at the same time, like for instance the Reflection API. -- Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/ GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69

« previous php.internals (#14210) next »