Re: Re: more whoiswho fallback (not peclweb this time)

From: Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:43:30 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: more whoiswho fallback (not peclweb this time)
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-14289@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:36:51 +0200, Steph <steph@zend.com> wrote: > > I think that the EXTENSIONS file should reflect the state of the branch, > > so if an extension doesn't reside there anymore, then the entry from > > that file should be deleted. > and sapi/activescript? That doesn't exist in HEAD. > > If it's one of the magic in-pecl-and-disto extensions (like sqlite) then > > it should be listed in EXTENSIONS, but also point people to the PECL > > page for that extension (which, theoretically, should be more up-to-date). > (proposed entry) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > EXTENSION: sqlite > COMMENT: see http://pecl.php.net/package/SQLite > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This seems fine to me; the PECL page will always be up-to-date, regardless of the PHP version that the EXTENSIONS file came with. > > One of the things I'd like to see is an auto-generated EXTENSIONS file > > based on the package.xml files we have all over now (since hartmut went > > through and fleshed them out). Likewise, the CREDITS files could be > > generated that way too. > > Yes, that'd work nicely for PHP 5. Not PHP 4 tho'... That's moot IMO, since we "can't" change stuff on released branches. --Wez.

« previous php.internals (#14289) next »