Re: Re: more whoiswho fallback (not peclweb this time)
| From: | Wez Furlong | Date: | Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:43:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: more whoiswho fallback (not peclweb this time) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-14289@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:36:51 +0200, Steph <steph@zend.com> wrote:
> > I think that the EXTENSIONS file should reflect the state of the branch,
> > so if an extension doesn't reside there anymore, then the entry from
> > that file should be deleted.
> and sapi/activescript?
That doesn't exist in HEAD.
> > If it's one of the magic in-pecl-and-disto extensions (like sqlite) then
> > it should be listed in EXTENSIONS, but also point people to the PECL
> > page for that extension (which, theoretically, should be more up-to-date).
> (proposed entry)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> EXTENSION: sqlite
> COMMENT: see http://pecl.php.net/package/SQLite
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This seems fine to me; the PECL page will always be up-to-date,
regardless of the PHP version that the EXTENSIONS file came with.
> > One of the things I'd like to see is an auto-generated EXTENSIONS file
> > based on the package.xml files we have all over now (since hartmut went
> > through and fleshed them out). Likewise, the CREDITS files could be
> > generated that way too.
>
> Yes, that'd work nicely for PHP 5. Not PHP 4 tho'...
That's moot IMO, since we "can't" change stuff on released branches.
--Wez.