Re: Re: [ZEND-ENGINE-CVS] cvs: TSRM(PHP_4_3) / TSRM.c TSRM.h tsrm_config.nw.h tsrm_config_common.h tsrm_nw.c tsrm_nw.h
tsrm_virtual_cwd.c tsrm_virtual_cwd.h tsrm_win32.c tsrm_win32.h

From: Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 02:45:46 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [ZEND-ENGINE-CVS] cvs: TSRM(PHP_4_3) / TSRM.c TSRM.h tsrm_config.nw.h tsrm_config_common.h tsrm_nw.c tsrm_nw.h
tsrm_virtual_cwd.c tsrm_virtual_cwd.h tsrm_win32.c tsrm_win32.h
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-14818@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Jani, This looks like a very serious change for 4.3.x series. It should really be discussed on internals@ before you fire away.
    Sure, let's discuss. This is the only way to get any attention to
    anything anyway. Just to note first of all that I asked Ilia (who was the release
    god for PHP_4_3 last time I checked..) and he didn't object to syncing HEAD
    TSRM as long as it's fixes only.
    And it does fix a lot: There are no more leaks in ZTS mode.
    Plus it's actually maintainable now when all those whitespace changes, etc.
    are in the PHP_4_3 branch too.
There was also agreement a while ago that realpath caching will only be in 5.1.x so that it gets enough testing.
    AFAICT, it's not enabled in HEAD nor it is enabled in PHP_4_3 so I don't
    really see any problems there.
Also as most of these fixes are Netware/Windows related, I don't think it's worth the risk of crashes and other problems we said we might have with some of the changes.
    Which change are you referring to here? (And I wouldn't worry about netware here..)
    --Jani


« previous php.internals (#14818) next »