RE: [PHP-DEV] Autoboxing in php 5.1
| From: | David Kingma | jool.nl | Date: | Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:54:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] Autoboxing in php 5.1 | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-14867@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> -----Original Message-----
> Can't you use the reflection API to get the data?
Not yet. My first feature request would be to add a getDocComment() to the
ReflectionProperty class. You can generate a WSDL file using the reflection
API but for the xml-schema part of the wsdl file you have to manually read
the sourcecode and find the comment prepending a class property (tokenizer
or regex) :(
Regards,
David
> At 11:19 PM 2/11/2005 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> >Hello Andi,
> >
> >Friday, February 11, 2005, 8:51:16 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > > At 01:33 PM 2/11/2005 -0500, Sean Coates wrote:
> > >>Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > >>>I think phpDoc is the solution because especially as we
> start going
> > >>>into the web services realm we're going to need to document more
> > >>>complex signatures and this kind of syntax won't be
> sufficient anyway.
> > >>>We will need to have a way to document web services so
> that we can
> > >>>auto-generate WSDL files.
> > >>
> > >>It would be nice to be able to (optionally) parse phpdoc comments
> > >>with the reflection API (not only return the docComment, but also
> > >>parse it into appropriate pieces), if this is going to be
> the "official" way to do this.
> > >>
> > >>Note: I'm not making any demands... just an idea/request.
> >
> > > Yes, that could be nice. Maybe someone will write an
> ext/docComment.
> > > Shouldn't be too hard.
> >
> >We'd need a new engine function pointer, one that allows to
> interpret
> >every docComment grabbed from the script :-)
> >
> >
> >--
> >Best regards,
> > Marcus mailto:helly@php.net
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To
> unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>