Re: PHP 5.0.4 PEAR issue
| From: | James Ellis | Date: | Sat, 02 Apr 2005 01:51:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP 5.0.4 PEAR issue | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-15726@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi
I think a 5.0.4.1 would be the best way to go (not sure what
versioning to use), as there are no real code changes to justify a
5.05. You could then provide a patch with notes for those with 5.04
installed or they could compile 5.0.4.1
I'd suggest if you rerelease the 5.0.4 as "5.0.4" then those with
5.0.4 installed will become a bit confused as to what they have
installed (unless they do the checksum check).
As for the CVS issue, I find in the code I write, doing a "cvs diff ."
on my local directory tells me if anything is not in the repository,
then I can cvs add and cvs commit once done.
I then tag with the version number, roll a release package and install
it on a pre production machine. Once the package is tested on a pre
production machine I know that it will be ok in userspace -- if not I
source the problem and roll a pre producton package again.
HTH
James
On Apr 1, 2005 8:25 PM, Matthew Fonda <mfonda@php.net> wrote:
>
> Option [a] seems like the most logical thing to do, would probably work the
> best. It might be nice to note on php.net somewhere right now before this is
> fixed that PEAR will not install.
>
> > The options we have, as far as I can tell, are:
> >
> > [a] Re-release 5.0.4 with that file
> > [b] Release 5.0.5 with that file (seems a bit too aggressive considering
> > there are no code changes, and may cause confusion)
> > [c] Instruct people to install PEAR from
> > http://go-pear.org
> >
> > I lean towards option [a]. Thoughts?
> >
> > Zeev
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>