Re: __autoload() enhancement

On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote: > On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > I don't think the right solution though is to leave the not-optimal > > solution in the engine, and create a solution outside the engine. I think > > we should find a way to tune the engine so that it works well. Zeev's > > suggestion keeps BC. If there are concerns as far as chaining order are > > concerned, I personally don't have a problem supplying an API function > > where functions can be added programmatically. > > We'd then get the best of both worlds and make it very accessible by everyone. > > FWIW, I don't think maintaining BC is super important here. I don't > believe lots of people are using __autoload() currently, and it should > be pretty trivial to migrate to whatever solution we end up with. BC is always important. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org