Re: Re: [mail] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Attributes support proposal
| From: | Duncan McIntyre | Date: | Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:47:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [mail] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Attributes support proposal | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-16114@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 2:19 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 16:58 27/04/2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
> >I remember similar arguments being made about most of the new OO features
> >in PHP5.
> >
> >Out of interest, how is this more bloated than storing doc comments in
> > memory?
>
> It's feature bloat, not memory consumption bloat. Adding obscure operators
> is the worst thing to do, since it reduces readability and complicates the
> language. Comments can be ignored, removed, be completely 'broken', etc. -
> you can use them if you understand them and they're useful to you, but
> you'll never get a piece of code which you wouldn't understand because of
> the comment. Not so with features such as attributes.
>
How about adding a new keyword instead, if you don't like @[..]?
Say, attributes(..) or metadata(..) or something we can all agree on?
D.