Re: PHP standard depends on other extensions

From: Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:41:28 +0000
Subject: Re: PHP standard depends on other extensions
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-17388@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Friday 22 of July 2005 19:56, Johannes Schlueter wrote: > A build with spl statically compiled in is for me just a few k bigger than > a build without spl. But building spl shared wouldn't work well for two > reasons: It deals with quite engine-near stuff (like overriding the [] > syntax or __autoload()) and other extensions behave different depending on > wether it was compiled in or not (for example MySQLi's MysqliException is > extended from SPL's RuntimeException if available at compile time) > > btw. I don't see a reason for building basic extensions as shared... In the other way, SPL requires compiled-in XML library because if even I can get XML in shared extension then SPL will be without SimpleXMLIterator, etc. Should I consider spl with simplexml as basic extensions? I'd like to have very light php binary so it could be used as interpreter for system scripts. > I can't reproduce this on my readline-powered box and your link states "We > believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of > libedit" if not please report to the libedit guys or use readline. ;-) Still it is not fixed. The readline library is GPL and is not compatible with PHP license, so the libedit is the only choise. -- .''`. Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA : :' : mailto:Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl . ' mailto:dexter@debian.org `-

« previous php.internals (#17388) next »