Re: Re: PHP 5.1: Does it still require ext/xmlrpc for pear?

'Replace'? Code written for ext/xmlrpc won't work with ext/xmlrpci. Will ext/xmlrpc be available in PECL, given that it doesn't appear to have an active maintainer? I'm well aware of ext/xmlrpc's limitations, haven't tried the new (but necessary) pecl/xmlrpci yet, and have the tiny issue that a bunch of my scripts will need a complete rewrite if the old extension is simply taken away from PHP 5 up. I suspect I'm far from being alone in that - do we have figures for core extension usage, anyone? ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Coggeshall" <john@coggeshall.org> To: "Jani Taskinen" <sniper@iki.fi> Cc: "Rasmus Lerdorf" <rasmus@lerdorf.com>; <internals@lists.php.net>; <rasmus@php.net> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 3:42 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.1: Does it still require ext/xmlrpc for pear? > On that line though, I'd like to finish up the ext/xmlrpci ext I've got > in PECL and replace ext/xmlrpc. It'll eliminate the custom lib we have > for that ext, ground-up designed for PHP 5 (ext/soap style overloading, > etc.) Objections? > > Cheers, > > John > > On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 04:10 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > > > > Jani Taskinen wrote: > > >> > > >> If I understood correctly, the fixed XML_RPC pear package > > >> was updated to the PHP_5_1 branch already. Why is ext/xmlrpc > > >> still required? > > > > > > It isn't. > > > > Ok. Fix committed. :) > > > > --Jani > > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >