Re: Nobody cares about the aggregation bug?
| From: | (Marcus Börger) | Date: | Thu, 22 May 2003 19:10:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Nobody cares about the aggregation bug? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-1911@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 21:00 22.05.2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 08:31 PM 5/22/2003 +0200, Marcus Börger wrote:Really? I can only remember that aggregation should be moved to the engine. And aggregation is far away from interfaces. However there is still a debate on delegates open. They are close to aggregation when done at runtime. But i would like them as in delphi and there they are done at compile time. So actually i think we could have all three, can't we? marcusAt 18:26 22.05.2003, Wei He wrote:I remember agreeing that interfaces is going to be the aggregation alternative at the language level. If people want to build on top of this outside of Zend, although I'm not sure it's a good idea, this can be done.Hi, It seems that nobody cares about the aggregation bug. I know someone can avoid using aggregation by proxy calls or even method duplication like what I'm doing now. But what I'm warrying about is that what if it is a zend hash bug. It might affect some other places at expected moments and thus costing a lot of time of many people.aggregation is still to be considered, whether it makes it into ze2 or be dropped or fixed or replaced by other oo goodies. (So far there was no final decision from zend).