Re: date() behaviour changed in 5.1?

From: Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:18:38 +0000
Subject: Re: date() behaviour changed in 5.1?
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-20012@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Pierre wrote: > On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:59:32 +0200 (EET) > sniper@iki.fi (Jani Taskinen) wrote: > > >> If you pass bad data to a function, it should not warn you? >> I'd rather have it as a FATAL error. :) >> >> Nothing to fix here, move along. (and fix your code..) > > > PHP is losely typed, I see nothing wrong to pass an integer as string > there (for example, imagecreate("100", "100"); works). FWIW, I don't mind forcing an INT here (or an all-numeric string) -- I know my code was wrong; I admitted this in the first mail. We need to warn users about it, if we do, though. I'm only bringing this up because the behaviour _changed_ from 5.0 S

« previous php.internals (#20012) next »