Re: Request for Threads or SRM

Hello Oliver, feel free to write an interface that supports return by reference and be done. Having ArrayAccess in use we had to chose one of two possibilities. First go with return by reference and second go with return by copy. We chose return by copy simply because that was the intended use anyway. That it was possible to add return by reference to its signature was an error in the first place. Actually one that we mentioned very early. But this is again ignorance and maybe not writing every tiny piece of change n some document that nobody reads anyway. And oh it is in th NEWS file. marcus Friday, November 25, 2005, 8:47:44 PM, you wrote: > Sara Golemon schrieb: >> ArrayAccess interface for the dimension read/write. > Just to bring the issue up agaian: The current ArrayAccess > implementation does not allow for proper simulation of arrays. This has > been "broken by fixing" (tm) the method prototypes not to allow "&" > anymore in interface implementations where the interface doesn't specify > a "&" for the corresponding method and at the same time not changing > ArrayAccess to feature a "&" for offsetGet. =>> You can't do > $ArrayAccesImplementingObject['virtual offset'][]='test'; > for offsets that are arrays. > OLLi Best regards, Marcus