Re: Namespaces: Technical proposal

Just wondering. There's another thread about goto and labels running as well. If they vote for something like: LABEL:while (cond) { } Wouldn't this add another technical diffuculty with using ':' as a namespace seporator? Fortunately this is another new feature so there's no old code to break. It's simply a matter of giving namespace:class precedence over label:expr.

Though yes, preventing that duality of meaning is a good thing. -Sara