Re: Labeled Break (nothing at all whatsoever to do with GOTO)

SG>>Actual labeled breaks. Not the break+jump that was proposed earlier in the I think the idea is OK, though I don't like a syntax. There is a standard for/while syntax which is used by a lot of procedural languages, and I see no reason to break it. I see nothing wrong with using FOO: for label. SG>>* Labels can be repeated by siblings. I'm not married to this, and it I don't think this is really needed, though it's doable and has some logic in it (after all, once the labelled block ends, the label is not longer existing). SG>>* Labeled breaks also apply to continue; For example: yes, I think it's a good way to do it. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.115