Re: Why Move to PECL?
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:02:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Why Move to PECL? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-2266@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 15:16:30 +0100
> "James Cox" <james@imajes.info> wrote:
>
> > How do we get here?
> >
> > By moving PECL into the limelight. This week, I will be splitting PECL
> > into it's own cvs module, and (after discussion) I'd like to create a
> > version of pearweb for pecl.php.net, essentially seperating the PEAR
> > and PECL projects.
>
> I do not agree here with pecl.php.net. From the early days of PEAR, it
> contains PEAR and PECL, the roadmaps of PEAR was always to take care of
> PECL inside the PEAR infrastructure.
I agree, I go with Markus' aliasing and highlighting thingy.
> As a sidenote, the installer currently does not support multiple master
> servers.
Fix it! ;)
regards,
Derick
--
"my other box is your windows PC"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
International PHP Magazine http://php-mag.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------