RE: #36983 [Bgs] (Meaning of "Bogus")
| From: | Ford, Mike | Date: | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:44:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: #36983 [Bgs] (Meaning of "Bogus") | ||
| Groups: | php.internals | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-22700@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 05 April 2006 21:22, crisp at tweakers dot net wrote:
> ID: 36983
> User updated by: crisp at tweakers dot net
> Reported By: crisp at tweakers dot net
> Status: Bogus
>
> That last remark is taking my well-meant criticism to the extreme;
> surely you will know that that was not what I meant.
> 'bogus' has a negative ring to it - at least it does for me as a
> non-native English-speaking person.
Redirecting this to internals@ as I want to comment but don't think the public bugs forum is
appropriate.
As an English-native English speaker, I've long been dissatisfied with the "Bogus"
status. To me, "bogus" means false, fake, fraudulent, made-up with intent to deceive;
I've come to understand that it is not so strongly negative in American English, but
nonetheless it still jars every time I see it.
As an international project, should PHP not strongly consider changing something that has such bad
connotations for a significant part of the English-speaking community? Even if you (we) avoid
offending only a handful of people, is that not a worthwhile payback?
Not sure what you'd use as a replacement -- "Not PHP Bug" sounds good, but
doesn't really work for submissions currently bogussed for being duplicates.
Thoughts?
Cheers!
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Ford, Electronic Information Services Adviser,
Learning Support Services, Learning & Information Services,
JG125, James Graham Building, Leeds Metropolitan University,
Headingley Campus, LEEDS, LS6 3QS, United Kingdom
Email: m.ford@leedsmet.ac.uk
Tel: +44 113 283 2600 extn 4730 Fax: +44 113 283 3211
To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm