Re: more candidates for PECL

From: Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:15:41 +0000
Subject: Re: more candidates for PECL
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-22977@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Wez Furlong wrote: > The problem with moving ext/skeleton is that we'll end up shipping PHP > without an extension template of any kind. Almost every single PHP > book that talks about writing extensions uses ext_skel to do so. > > Giving PECL_gen some good press is a different issue, and does not > require that we move ext/skeleton or ext_skel. > > I can't see any negative points to keeping ext/skeleton in the tree. Yeah, I want to keep that too. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org

« previous php.internals (#22977) next »