Re: [PATCH] Preliminary OpenSSL Changes (PEM)

Wez Furlong wrote: > Probably the biggest problem is that it requires C++. > We mentioned to you that C++ was something we avoided in PHP because > it tends to create more problems than it's worth, particularly so in > something that is part of the core distribution. I must have missed that. Although I do remember asking about it and not getting a response. Don't see anything in the archives either. > Can you write it in C instead? I could, but I've finished the functionality I need so now it's hard to justify the time to do a complete rewrite. deadlines, deadlines... I don't see a crypto package in PECL and none of what I've done is strictly SSL related, so would it be acceptable if I fork and submit a module to PECL? Assuming I find the time.