Re: FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch

From: Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:33:17 +0000
Subject: Re: FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch
Groups: php.internals php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-24353@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Here is a small patch allowing to correct the small leak. This one will have to be merge with that of Michael - (its patch is correct and does not contain any leak (I were not clear in my last mail) - thus +1) http://badcode.be/~descript/PHP/PHP_5_2-php-main.diff Michael Vergoz ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Vergoz" <mv-php@binarysec.com> To: "Andi Gutmans" <andi@zend.com>; "'Dmitry Stogov'" <dmitry@zend.com>; "'PHPdev'" <internals@lists.php.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 8:29 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch
Salut Andi & Dmitry, If you have errors in your script you have a leak in PG(last_error_message) & PG(last_error_file) because of php_error_cb() which allocates via strdup() these two variables. It should be noted also that these variables are not given with NULL after their freed in php_error_cb() - main/main.c +679 and that both last allowance will never be freed for each thread. They are freed with the stop of the process via php_module_shutdown(). I propose to free these buffer in php_request_shutdown()? In fact the leak more are the small ones but they become repetitive in a Threaded program. There is also another condition to generate large mem leak for example by re-using a thread to carry out several script with the continuation. There you explodes all the records if you do not do a ts_free_thread() just after your php_request_shutdown(). It's for that which I think that it would be very judicious to add a ts_free_thread() before each the return() of the HttpExtensionProc() function of the ISAPI SAPI module. Michael Vergoz ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andi Gutmans" <andi@zend.com> To: "'Michael Vergoz'" <mv-php@binarysec.com>; "'Dmitry Stogov'" <dmitry@zend.com>; "'PHPdev'" <internals@lists.php.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 7:38 PM Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch
Are you sure this isn't because the IIS thread is still running? One thread handles multiple requests.
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Vergoz [mailto:mv-php@binarysec.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 10:33 AM To: Dmitry Stogov; 'Andi Gutmans'; PHPdev Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch In fact I had found some leaks it would seem that ts_free_thread() after php_request_shutdown() solves all the problem. I am checking if it's bad but if not the case the SAPI ISAPI should have a small modification. mv- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dmitry Stogov" <dmitry@zend.com> To: "'Michael Vergoz'" <mv-php@binarysec.com>; "'Andi Gutmans'" <andi@zend.com>; <internals@lists.php.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 1:54 PM Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch
Hi Michael, The patch was tested in ZTS mode too. What SAPI you are talking about? (I would like to reproduce
the problem).
Thanks. Dmitry.
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Vergoz [mailto:mv-php@binarysec.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 1:22 PM To: Andi Gutmans; internals@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch Hi aAndy
We didn't find a material difference between malloc() and mmap() though, most probably because malloc() at these sizes
actually calls
mmap().
You can have good difference with the mremap() of Linux because it directly changes the vector into memory without recopying these data. -- Before beginning a benchmark I would like to speak about a serious problem that I have with TSRM/MM. A S1 script carried out by thread T1 will use the same memory capacity as S2 script by T2 whereas theoretically separation is obligatory. In addition to the problem of safety, that cause also a problem of management of the load memory of the process father. We define a father process P=while(1); When a process father starts it must initialize tsrm_startup(), sapi_startup() and php_module_startup(). At this time all the additional functions and objects are loaded and usable by all script (what is normal). With the creation of a thread one associates a TSRMLS to
it. Then one
carries out php_request_startup(), php_execute_script() and php_request_shutdown() to entirely enclose PHP/Zend. With the execution of Sx script in Tx: the variables dynamics, static and constant of this one will be stored in AG(head). The problem comes from there. It is impossible to destroy a memory which a script has just used because the process father continues to turn and nor php_request_shutdown(), php_module_shutdown(), sapi_shutdown() and tsrm_shutdown() will not be carried out AND THUS there will be a mem leak I am very annoyed by this problem, it is necessary that I find a possibility to destroy these buffer. Michael Vergoz ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andi Gutmans" <andi@zend.com> To: "'Michael Vergoz'" <mv-php@binarysec.com>; <internals@lists.php.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 8:26 AM Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch
Sorry I didn't make clear that only the malloc()/free()
part works.
The mmap() and Win32 Allocation code is commented. We didn't find a material difference between malloc() and
mmap() though,
most probably because malloc() at these sizes actually
calls mmap().
So really most important is for some ppl to run some
benchmarks on this.
Thx. Andi
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Vergoz [mailto:mv-php@binarysec.com] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 5:25 PM To: Andi Gutmans; internals@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking
memory patch
Hi Andi, I appreciated to see this code which I must still
study. Already a
small remark it is that the system call mremap() is not
portable it
is available only on Linux. Then the size of the segments
must always
"be paginated" - normally your code is good on this level. I think that a concept of kernel-memory and user-memory can be very interesting to study, especially in threads environments - that I use. I would continue to look at your code but now I will
sleep (04:26
pm)! mv- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andi Gutmans" <andi@zend.com> To: "'Andi Gutmans'" <andi@zend.com>; <internals@lists.php.net> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 5:57 PM Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking
memory patch
No help??? Come on guys. I'm sure some of you can spare a
few idle cycles
:)
-----Original Message----- From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:andi@zend.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 8:38 PM To: internals@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking
memory patch
Sending 3rd time this time without the attachment. You can get the diff at http://gutmans.org/alloc.zip -----Original Message----- From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:andi@zend.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 11:06 PM To: 'internals@lists.php.net' Subject: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch Hi all, Attached is a patch we've been working on to improve
the memory
management of PHP. This patch's main advantage is
reducing the
memory footprint of PHP, and therefore allowing it to scale better. Although at low concurrencies the change seems to be negligble, while testing at higher concurrencies we saw significant improvement with this patch, mainly due to lower memory usage. We would very much appreciate if people here tested
this patch and
send in their results. It would help us understand if
others are
getting consistent results with ours, and also see
whether there
are any additional improvements we should make. This patch should apply cleanly to the PHP 5.2 CVS
tree. There's
not much tuning that needs to be done. It uses malloc() to allocate large memory blocks. You can
control the size
of these blocks by setting the ZEND_MM_SEG_SIZE environment variable before starting Apache/PHP. You may use K
or M to play
around with the block size. The default we are using is 256KB which seems to be a good balance. Any feedback would be appreciated! Andi -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


« previous php.internals (#24353) next »