Re: FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch
| From: | Michael Vergoz | Date: | Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:33:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch | ||
| Groups: | php.internals php.internals | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-24353@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Here is a small patch allowing to correct the small leak. This one will have to be merge with that of Michael - (its patch is correct and does not contain any leak (I were not clear in my last mail) - thus +1)
http://badcode.be/~descript/PHP/PHP_5_2-php-main.diff
Michael Vergoz
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Vergoz" <mv-php@binarysec.com>
To: "Andi Gutmans" <andi@zend.com>; "'Dmitry Stogov'" <dmitry@zend.com>; "'PHPdev'" <internals@lists.php.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch
Salut Andi & Dmitry, If you have errors in your script you have a leak in PG(last_error_message) & PG(last_error_file) because of php_error_cb() which allocates via strdup() these two variables. It should be noted also that these variables are not given with NULL after their freed in php_error_cb() - main/main.c +679 and that both last allowance will never be freed for each thread. They are freed with the stop of the process via php_module_shutdown(). I propose to free these buffer in php_request_shutdown()? In fact the leak more are the small ones but they become repetitive in a Threaded program. There is also another condition to generate large mem leak for example by re-using a thread to carry out several script with the continuation. There you explodes all the records if you do not do a ts_free_thread() just after your php_request_shutdown(). It's for that which I think that it would be very judicious to add a ts_free_thread() before each the return() of the HttpExtensionProc() function of the ISAPI SAPI module. Michael Vergoz ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andi Gutmans" <andi@zend.com> To: "'Michael Vergoz'" <mv-php@binarysec.com>; "'Dmitry Stogov'" <dmitry@zend.com>; "'PHPdev'" <internals@lists.php.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 7:38 PM Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patchAre you sure this isn't because the IIS thread is still running? One thread handles multiple requests.Hi Michael, The patch was tested in ZTS mode too. What SAPI you are talking about? (I would like to reproduce-----Original Message----- From: Michael Vergoz [mailto:mv-php@binarysec.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 10:33 AM To: Dmitry Stogov; 'Andi Gutmans'; PHPdev Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch In fact I had found some leaks it would seem that ts_free_thread() after php_request_shutdown() solves all the problem. I am checking if it's bad but if not the case the SAPI ISAPI should have a small modification. mv- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dmitry Stogov" <dmitry@zend.com> To: "'Michael Vergoz'" <mv-php@binarysec.com>; "'Andi Gutmans'" <andi@zend.com>; <internals@lists.php.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 1:54 PM Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patchThanks. Dmitry.the problem).-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phpWe didn't find a material difference between malloc() and mmap() though, most probably because malloc() at these sizes-----Original Message----- From: Michael Vergoz [mailto:mv-php@binarysec.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 1:22 PM To: Andi Gutmans; internals@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch Hi aAndymmap().actually callsSorry I didn't make clear that only the malloc()/free()it. Then oneYou can have good difference with the mremap() of Linux because it directly changes the vector into memory without recopying these data. -- Before beginning a benchmark I would like to speak about a serious problem that I have with TSRM/MM. A S1 script carried out by thread T1 will use the same memory capacity as S2 script by T2 whereas theoretically separation is obligatory. In addition to the problem of safety, that cause also a problem of management of the load memory of the process father. We define a father process P=while(1); When a process father starts it must initialize tsrm_startup(), sapi_startup() and php_module_startup(). At this time all the additional functions and objects are loaded and usable by all script (what is normal). With the creation of a thread one associates a TSRMLS tocarries out php_request_startup(), php_execute_script() and php_request_shutdown() to entirely enclose PHP/Zend. With the execution of Sx script in Tx: the variables dynamics, static and constant of this one will be stored in AG(head). The problem comes from there. It is impossible to destroy a memory which a script has just used because the process father continues to turn and nor php_request_shutdown(), php_module_shutdown(), sapi_shutdown() and tsrm_shutdown() will not be carried out AND THUS there will be a mem leak I am very annoyed by this problem, it is necessary that I find a possibility to destroy these buffer. Michael Vergoz ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andi Gutmans" <andi@zend.com> To: "'Michael Vergoz'" <mv-php@binarysec.com>; <internals@lists.php.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 8:26 AM Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarking memory patchpart works.The mmap() and Win32 Allocation code is commented. We didn't find a material difference between malloc() andmost probably because malloc() at these sizes actuallymmap() though,calls mmap().So really most important is for some ppl to run someThx. Andibenchmarks on this.memory patch-----Original Message----- From: Michael Vergoz [mailto:mv-php@binarysec.com] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 5:25 PM To: Andi Gutmans; internals@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarkingstudy. Already aHi Andi, I appreciated to see this code which I must stillsleep (04:26portable itsmall remark it is that the system call mremap() is notmust alwaysis available only on Linux. Then the size of the segments"be paginated" - normally your code is good on this level. I think that a concept of kernel-memory and user-memory can be very interesting to study, especially in threads environments - that I use. I would continue to look at your code but now I willmemory patchpm)! mv- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andi Gutmans" <andi@zend.com> To: "'Andi Gutmans'" <andi@zend.com>; <internals@lists.php.net> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 5:57 PM Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarkingNo help??? Come on guys. I'm sure some of you can spare a:)few idle cyclesmemory patch-----Original Message----- From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:andi@zend.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 8:38 PM To: internals@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP-DEV] FW: Help needed in benchmarkingthe memorySending 3rd time this time without the attachment. You can get the diff at http://gutmans.org/alloc.zip -----Original Message----- From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:andi@zend.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 11:06 PM To: 'internals@lists.php.net' Subject: Help needed in benchmarking memory patch Hi all, Attached is a patch we've been working on to improvereducing themanagement of PHP. This patch's main advantage isor M to playthis patch andmemory footprint of PHP, and therefore allowing it to scale better. Although at low concurrencies the change seems to be negligble, while testing at higher concurrencies we saw significant improvement with this patch, mainly due to lower memory usage. We would very much appreciate if people here testedothers aresend in their results. It would help us understand ifwhether theregetting consistent results with ours, and also seetree. There'sare any additional improvements we should make. This patch should apply cleanly to the PHP 5.2 CVScontrol the sizenot much tuning that needs to be done. It uses malloc() to allocate large memory blocks. You canof these blocks by setting the ZEND_MM_SEG_SIZE environment variable before starting Apache/PHP. You may use K-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phparound with the block size. The default we are using is 256KB which seems to be a good balance. Any feedback would be appreciated! Andi -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php