Re: does 16M give a counting overhead ?
| From: | bertrand Gugger | Date: | Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:30:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: does 16M give a counting overhead ? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-25060@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Andi Gutmans wrote:
There is no hardcoded counting. We either cound (--enable-memory-limit) or we don't (i.e. we rely on the system limits) OK , I guess I have to find out where this php , constant , system wide limit is.I thought the 8M limit was due to PHP , is it C doing it ? Thanks for the kind answers. -- toggg
Andi-----Original Message----- From: bertrand Gugger [mailto:bertrand@toggg.com] Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 1:10 PM To: internals@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] does 16M give a counting overhead ? Andi Gutmans wrote:Hi Bertrand, The discussion is on how and what we count, not on whetherto count or not. The quoted discussion is/was , this one is about the possibility to get 16M without counting.If you count in 256KB increments instead of in byte increments then there's less counting to do in order to get to 16MB :)Is the hardcoded 8M counting that way ? ( I mean , without --enable-memory-limit ) -- toggg -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php