Re: RfC: rethink OO inheritance strictness

Hello Pierre, if you cannot read stop blaming me. It was Robert and not Christian. And then read carefully again. You might get the connection. If not i am all sorry. marcus Wednesday, August 2, 2006, 12:41:40 PM, you wrote: > On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 02:42:10 +0200 > helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) wrote: >> Hello Robert, >> >> Wednesday, August 2, 2006, 2:32:27 AM, you wrote: >> >> > To make a better language. Following all the sheep out there just >> > makes for more fodder. Just because it's in the books, doesn't make >> > it the best way. Innovation doesn't come by following the pack it >> > almost always comes from changing the game. >> >> This is a ridiculous accusation of my person directly - but thanks. >> We chose a damn good set available yet working. And i invented for >> example iterators in php, sorry it is only that. But it is far most >> the best iterator implementation any language out there has. And i am >> not paid for anything (like most of us) so sorry we cannot do it >> better. > It is a discussion where developers and users tell their opinion on a > technical (or theoretical) topic. It is the second time in this thread > that you jumped out of your big horse to say such things. It is > pointless. The fact that you work on the iterators or whatever else > does not make you right, not more than me or Christian. >> Instead of argumenting like this you guys should start helping us. > It is what I do, as much if not more as you do, and I second Robert's > opinion. And I do not say that you are responsible for all PHP's recent > troubles, only that I have the same *opinion* than him on this topic. > -- Pierre Best regards, Marcus