Re: increase the default memory limit in 5.2.0+
| From: | Ilia Alshanetsky | Date: | Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:04:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: increase the default memory limit in 5.2.0+ | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-25386@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I've bumped the memory limit to 16 megs in RC2 and PHP6.
On 16-Aug-06, at 8:43 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
The new memory manager actually wastes less memory than the old one, scales better and most important to this discussion, the memory consumption is far more accurate as it also takes into account the memory manager overhead. Therefore, we are not consuming 1.5x memory, but we are reporting a more accurate number which is about 1.5x of what the old one reported. My suggestion is to raise the limit to 16M both in the php.ini* files that come with PHP and in the source. AndiIlia Alshanetsky-----Original Message----- From: Stefan Esser [mailto:sesser@php.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 5:40 AM To: pierre.php@gmail.com Cc: internals@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] increase the default memory limit in 5.2.0+ Hello,--PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phpAfter having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of weeks, I notice a significant increase of the reportedmemory usage.As a side effect, many applications reach the 8M memorylimit. It canbe a problem. A good example is to compare the usage of a pear/peclcommand between5.1 and 5.2.The question is why do we want a new memory manager that seems to allocate 1.5 times more memory than the old one. I haven't looked into it yet, but for me this looks like a waste of ressources. What are the advantages of it. I really doubt, that a significant speed increase can be measured, and I wonder if it worth the waste of memory. Yours, Stefan Esser -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php