Re: Multi-paradigm design (was: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: __autoloading and functions)
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:18:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Multi-paradigm design (was: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: __autoloading and functions) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-25594@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Terje Slettebø wrote:
> > > P.S: As an aside: Why is everybody (?) replying to both the list
> > > _and_ the poster? If you post, isn't it safe to assume you're
> > > actually on the list, or am I missing something?
> >
> > It is a common usage here. Some uses nntp, other mails (and filters,
> etc..).
>
> Ok. It's just that it's very unusual for mailing lists (at least the
> ones I have experience with), but whatever.
The following URL explains why it is a bad idea to mangle the reply-to
header (like some other lists do):
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> > It is also nice to do not start a new thread for no obvious reason but
> > having another topic, it makes a mess out of the archives and is
> > harder to follow.
>
> I'm afraid I didn't understand your point. When you say "start a thread",
> do
> you mean changing the subject line (as I did)? It's my understanding that
> people in general prefer that you change the subject line, if the topic
> changes, as it otherwise makes it much harder to follow the discussion...
> (and you may have to wade through a lot of postings having nothing to do
> with the subject line, or miss an interesting discussion, for the same
> reason).
Yup, but you should use "New Mail" and not "Reply-To" in that case as
now the new mail appears in the same thread as the old subject.
regards,
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org