Re: Re: Why isn't base class constructors or destructors required to be called? (was: Re: [PHP-DEV] Return type hints)

From: Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:30:02 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Why isn't base class constructors or destructors required to be called? (was: Re: [PHP-DEV] Return type hints)
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-25721@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 9/15/06, Terje Slettebø <tslettebo@broadpark.no> wrote:
From: "Marcus Boerger" <helly@php.net> PHP is not C++ and speaking of constructors and destrcutors PHP goes morethe Delphi way. I'd also like to know _why_ constructors/destructors are less fit for PHP, than these other languages?
Nobody said that. Marcus said PHP takes a more Delphi-like approach rather than a C++-like approach. PHP following some other language rather than your language of choice doesn't mean that its designed wrong. -- --Robert Deaton

« previous php.internals (#25721) next »