Re: Per-request UG(unicode)
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:45:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Per-request UG(unicode) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-25913@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>
> > Nooone is arguing that from the userspace side, having per-dir support for
> > setting the unicode flag is a good thing. It is. The question is: Is it
> > good enough to justify the soup that will become of the internal registries?
>
> I'm not sure there really would be a soup. Yes, there would be two copies of
> persistent system hashes - namely, class table and function table - and
> probably there would be a need to deal with other persistent tables like
> module lists in couple of places - but besides that there should be not much
> of a soup...
But that is already bad enough anyway. So would be -1 on this as well.
regards,
Derick