Re: RE: [ZEND-ENGINE-CVS] cvs: ZendEngine2(PHP_5_2) / zend_compile.c
| From: | Marcus Boerger | Date: | Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:18:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RE: [ZEND-ENGINE-CVS] cvs: ZendEngine2(PHP_5_2) / zend_compile.c | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-26147@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello William,
Saturday, October 21, 2006, 1:04:44 AM, you wrote:
> Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>>
>> On 20-Oct-06, at 5:10 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Ilia,
>>>
>>> also an ISO/shared server will never be securewhatever you do and
>>> you can
>>> make MySQL disaalow external connections. That basically means in those
>>> scenarios you do not need any authentication at all and thus get better
>>> speed as in more responses. Now is that bad?
>>
>> It is not, the only idea is that while your servers maybe secure,
>> however you may not entirely trust your datacenter, so encryption of the
>> data would protect you against man-in-the-middle attacks.
> This isn't philosophical, privacy regulations in many industries now mandate
> all tiered solutions use encryption between every network attached box, no
> matter if it's hiding behind the DMZ or not.
I was not saying no security is the best thing ever. I simply said that
insomesituations it is perfectly fine. That said the lack of encrypted
communication is no reason to drop mysql. We are discussing PHP here -
not how database applications shall be designed.
Best regards,
Marcus