Re: Windows build

Hello Ilia, weel 2002 aka 7.0 or 2003 aka 7.1 are pretty fine. We have left behind 6.0 long ago :-) best regards marcus Saturday, January 6, 2007, 5:44:55 AM, you wrote: > Edin, > Thanks for the detailed analysis and spending time analyzing the > issue. Based on what you've said I think our best option is to go > back to VC++ 6.0 for this release, we are too far along in the > release cycle to experiment with things. Perhaps for the next release > we can revisit the issue, assuming there an interest and a benefit of > using VC++ 8.0 can be quantified. > On 5-Jan-07, at 10:48 PM, Edin Kadribasic wrote: >> I looked around at other projects and everyone seems to be using VC++ >> 6.0 for their builds (Active state, apache, ...) which eliminates all >> the hassle with bundling C runtime, etc. >> >> So I think the best thing for us would be to stick to the good old C >> compiler for making the Windows distro. > Ilia Alshanetsky Best regards, Marcus