Re: Is this what Stefan Esser was referring to ...?
| From: | Rasmus Lerdorf | Date: | Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:27:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Is this what Stefan Esser was referring to ...? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-27575@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Alain Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:08:16AM +1100, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
>> From a bigger perspective, the reason we prefer people to not use the
>> PHP name for their projects, especially modified versions of PHP itself,
>> is that in the extreme case we want to avoid someone releasing PHP 7 on
>> us. That would confuse a lot of people. For better or worse, if
>> someone is using PHP they are using code we have control over, so when
>> they report a bug or describe a problem we have a pretty good idea about
>> how to go about fixing it. If they are using a heavily modified version
>> of PHP, then it becomes much harder for us to figure out what is going
>> on and by asking people to come up with their own brand for such
>> modifications it becomes obvious to everyone involved that there is a
>> different codebase involved.
>
> It is a difficult problem and we need to take care before adopting a stance
> on it, look what happened with the Debian firefox/iceweasle debacle.
It's not really up for discussion. The decision was reached some 8+
years ago with the adoption of the clause in the license which is quite
explicit.
-Rasmus